| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0653
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
68.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
369.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.3k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
16.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
5.25k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
12.61k (x0.52)
TOTAL
56.46k
38.72k (x0.69)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
18.1k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
79.16k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
26.75k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
13.81k (x0.1)
TOTAL
413.48k
137.82k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
26.29k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.51k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
12.84k (x0.56)
TOTAL
77.6k
68.02k (x0.88)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
163.37k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
159.38k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
38.87k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
7.39k (x0.06)
TOTAL
599.67k
369.01k (x0.62)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
598 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5677 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5437 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4