Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0653
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
27.46k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
24.28k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.65k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
11.92k (x0.52)
TOTAL
77.6k
69.31k (x0.89)
Multithread
5700X3D
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
165.5k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
156.32k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
39.88k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
5.96k (x0.05)
TOTAL
599.67k
367.65k (x0.61)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4