| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0652
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
15.65k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
23.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
5.66k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
11.43k (x0.52)
TOTAL
70.57k
55.87k (x0.79)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
26.77k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
43.81k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
10.17k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
11.91k (x0.1)
TOTAL
537.81k
92.66k (x0.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
27.14k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
24.75k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.73k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
11.84k (x0.52)
TOTAL
77.6k
69.47k (x0.9)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
105.77k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
107.47k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
24.82k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
8.02k (x0.07)
TOTAL
599.67k
246.07k (x0.41)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4