Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 6.8 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 6.8 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806ea
Core
Vermeer
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
21.09k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
19.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.05k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
2.8k (x0.12)
TOTAL
77.6k
47.35k (x0.61)
Multithread
5700X3D
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
38.23k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
38.89k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
8.75k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
2.47k (x0.02)
TOTAL
599.67k
88.35k (x0.15)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4