| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1659.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 2.8 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a60f12
Core
Vermeer
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
105 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
131072 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
119.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
1659.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
40.45k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
30.77k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
16.33k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
32.18k (x1.41)
TOTAL
77.6k
119.73k (x1.54)

Multithread

5700X3D

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
640.26k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
525.94k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
272.59k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
220.96k (x1.94)
TOTAL
599.67k
1659.74k (x2.77)

Performance/W
5700X3D
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
5335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
4383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
2272 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
1841 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
13831 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
7097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5399 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
21005 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4