Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.3 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.3 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a40f41
Core
Vermeer
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
24.35k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
26.85k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
11.82k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
24.18k (x1.06)
TOTAL
77.6k
87.21k (x1.12)
Multithread
5700X3D
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
152.84k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
208.12k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
88.84k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
12.57k (x0.11)
TOTAL
599.67k
462.36k (x0.77)
Performance/W
5700X3D
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4