| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
Both models 5700X3D and 5900HS are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 5900HS gets 431.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.4 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a50f00
Core
Vermeer
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
77.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
431.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
19.54k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.8k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.82k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
22.98k (x1.01)
TOTAL
77.6k
77.15k (x0.99)

Multithread

5700X3D

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
144.64k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
196.86k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
84.22k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
5.84k (x0.05)
TOTAL
599.67k
431.56k (x0.72)

Performance/W
5700X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
4132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
5625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
2406 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
167 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
12330 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
4248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16771 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4