Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.46k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
18.46k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
8.05k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
23.71k (x0.97)
TOTAL
56.46k
54.68k (x0.97)
Multithread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
52.65k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
265.41k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
140.78k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
46.91k (x0.35)
TOTAL
413.48k
505.76k (x1.22)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
17.35k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
25.87k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
8.72k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
27.86k (x1.12)
TOTAL
71.38k
79.8k (x1.12)
Multithread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
201.57k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
284.41k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
145.16k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
100.56k (x0.73)
TOTAL
527.2k
731.7k (x1.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
16.95k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
25.37k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
9.23k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
24.83k (x1.13)
TOTAL
70.57k
76.38k (x1.08)
Multithread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
196.31k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
290.5k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
143.95k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
64.92k (x0.55)
TOTAL
537.81k
695.69k (x1.29)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
16.73k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
24.74k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
8.82k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
22.22k (x0.97)
TOTAL
77.6k
72.51k (x0.93)
Multithread
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
248.24k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
309.66k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
140.01k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
58.39k (x0.51)
TOTAL
599.67k
756.3k (x1.26)
Performance/W
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4