| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs 6800H


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 6800H gets 485.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.2 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a40f41
Core
Vermeer
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
79.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
485.06k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
21.57k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.39k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.63k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
24.29k (x1.06)
TOTAL
77.6k
79.87k (x1.03)

Multithread

5700X3D

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
161.42k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
217.92k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
91.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
14.03k (x0.12)
TOTAL
599.67k
485.06k (x0.81)

Performance/W
5700X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
3587 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
4843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
2037 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
312 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
10779 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
4589 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
4976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2261 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
5168 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16994 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4