Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs 3800XT
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
17.57k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
27.38k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
9.35k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
23.9k (x1.05)
TOTAL
77.6k
78.2k (x1.01)
Multithread
5700X3D
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
176.08k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
219.88k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
100k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
12.93k (x0.11)
TOTAL
599.67k
508.89k (x0.85)
Performance/W
5700X3D
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4