| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
800f82
Core
Vermeer
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.41k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
15.96k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
4.69k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
17.42k (x0.72)
TOTAL
56.46k
41.47k (x0.73)

Multithread

5700X3D

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
20.88k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
110.37k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
39.25k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
6.66k (x0.05)
TOTAL
413.48k
177.16k (x0.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
13.76k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.12k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
15.23k (x0.67)
TOTAL
77.6k
57.13k (x0.74)

Multithread

5700X3D

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
83.23k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
161.06k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
40.52k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
6.73k (x0.06)
TOTAL
599.67k
291.53k (x0.49)

Performance/W
5700X3D
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4