Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
810f81
Core
Vermeer
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
5.34k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
6.62k (x0.27)
TOTAL
56.46k
33.79k (x0.6)
Multithread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
15.07k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
66.84k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
19.56k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
6.54k (x0.05)
TOTAL
413.48k
108.01k (x0.26)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
14.3k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
21.69k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
5.42k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
6.6k (x0.27)
TOTAL
71.38k
48k (x0.67)
Multithread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
55.45k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
83.13k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
20.76k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
6.58k (x0.05)
TOTAL
527.2k
165.91k (x0.31)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
13.05k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
22.88k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
5.39k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
7.31k (x0.33)
TOTAL
70.57k
48.63k (x0.69)
Multithread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
51.73k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
87.74k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
20.74k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
6.57k (x0.06)
TOTAL
537.81k
166.79k (x0.31)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
14.48k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
23.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
5.43k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
5.46k (x0.24)
TOTAL
77.6k
49.21k (x0.63)
Multithread
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
54.39k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
88.77k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
20.04k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
5.48k (x0.05)
TOTAL
599.67k
168.69k (x0.28)
Performance/W
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4