Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.5 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.5 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
b06f5
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
47.14k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
25.77k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
13.25k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.77k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.6k
100.94k (x1.3)
Multithread
5700X3D
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
168.51k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
142.8k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
63.57k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
15.34k (x0.13)
TOTAL
599.67k
390.23k (x0.65)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4