| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-12500H


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2.7 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906a3
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
6.93k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
18.76k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
9.46k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
8.17k (x0.34)
TOTAL
56.46k
43.33k (x0.77)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
18.04k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
66.78k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
37.55k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
6.08k (x0.05)
TOTAL
413.48k
128.45k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
21.93k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
18.79k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
10.5k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
8.11k (x0.33)
TOTAL
71.38k
59.33k (x0.83)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
61.07k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
86.08k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
41.08k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
6.02k (x0.04)
TOTAL
527.2k
194.25k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
21.11k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
19.61k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
9.53k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
7.72k (x0.35)
TOTAL
70.57k
57.97k (x0.82)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
61.44k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
93.66k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
40.09k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
6.01k (x0.05)
TOTAL
537.81k
201.2k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
22.61k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
17.73k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
9.63k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
8.4k (x0.37)
TOTAL
77.6k
58.37k (x0.75)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
85.49k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
94.93k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
39.15k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
6.08k (x0.05)
TOTAL
599.67k
225.65k (x0.38)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4