Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-12400
Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-12400 gets 552.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-12400 gets 552.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90675
Core
Vermeer
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
99.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
552.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
46.08k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
25.51k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
13.4k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.73k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.6k
99.72k (x1.29)
Multithread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
237.35k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
201.2k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
97.8k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
16.24k (x0.14)
TOTAL
599.67k
552.59k (x0.92)
Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
3652 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
3095 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
1505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
8501 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
10472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5798 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3348 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
22665 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4