| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i5-12400


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90672
Core
Vermeer
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
544.64k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
7.51k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
18.66k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
13.32k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
14.8k (x0.61)
TOTAL
56.46k
54.29k (x0.96)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
35.52k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
138.43k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
85.55k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
21.72k (x0.16)
TOTAL
413.48k
281.22k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
24.24k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
23.92k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
14.43k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
14.84k (x0.6)
TOTAL
71.38k
77.43k (x1.08)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
124.33k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
168.8k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
100k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
21.2k (x0.15)
TOTAL
527.2k
414.33k (x0.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
23.84k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
25.09k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
14.1k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
14.48k (x0.66)
TOTAL
70.57k
77.51k (x1.1)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
123.98k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
176.89k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
97.42k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
20.78k (x0.17)
TOTAL
537.81k
419.07k (x0.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
48.08k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
25.6k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
14.02k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
14.81k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.6k
102.51k (x1.32)

Multithread

5700X3D

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
230.14k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
198.07k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
94.78k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
21.64k (x0.19)
TOTAL
599.67k
544.64k (x0.91)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
8379 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4