| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 5700X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X3D gets a score of 599.7 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 4.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806c1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.6k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
599.67k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.48k
17.22k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.36k
9.79k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.35k
8.21k (x0.34)
TOTAL
56.46k
38.97k (x0.69)

Multithread

5700X3D

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.78k
9.19k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
150.83k
35.47k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.63k
19.14k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
133.24k
5.82k (x0.04)
TOTAL
413.48k
69.62k (x0.17)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
12.9k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.49k
21.4k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
10.73k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
8.16k (x0.33)
TOTAL
71.38k
53.19k (x0.75)

Multithread

5700X3D

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
109.77k
30.31k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
175.93k
45.13k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103.23k
20.17k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
138.27k
5.77k (x0.04)
TOTAL
527.2k
101.38k (x0.19)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
14.65k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.46k
21.57k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.52k
9.93k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.07k
8.02k (x0.36)
TOTAL
70.57k
54.18k (x0.77)

Multithread

5700X3D

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
110.52k
32.14k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
208.33k
43.54k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99.93k
19.58k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
119.03k
5.61k (x0.05)
TOTAL
537.81k
100.87k (x0.19)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.08k
24.25k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
21.63k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
9.09k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.82k
7.23k (x0.32)
TOTAL
77.6k
62.19k (x0.8)

Multithread

5700X3D

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
167.11k
56.9k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
218.19k
55.68k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.5k
19.29k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
113.87k
6.09k (x0.05)
TOTAL
599.67k
137.96k (x0.23)

Performance/W
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1592 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2078 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
5711 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X3D
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5140 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5656 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2564 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5567 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
18926 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4