Ryzen 7 5700X vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X is 3.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X is 3.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806ec
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
23.11k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
20.58k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
4.73k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
7.43k (x0.29)
TOTAL
85.64k
55.86k (x0.65)
Multithread
5700X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
65.84k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
60.77k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
14.45k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
4.44k (x0.38)
TOTAL
517.51k
145.51k (x0.28)
Performance/W
5700X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4