| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
870f10
Core
Vermeer
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
687.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5700X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.82k
4.39k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.73k
16.99k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
7.74k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.52k
24.57k (x0.89)
TOTAL
63.75k
53.69k (x0.84)

Multithread

5700X

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
32.8k
48.45k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
161.17k
230.81k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98k
122.82k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.92k
54.73k (x4.24)
TOTAL
304.88k
456.8k (x1.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
16.85k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
26.03k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
9.54k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
22.55k (x0.88)
TOTAL
85.64k
74.97k (x0.88)

Multithread

5700X

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
229.41k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
292.81k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
128.48k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
36.8k (x3.15)
TOTAL
517.51k
687.5k (x1.33)

Performance/W
5700X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4