| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X vs 7840HS


Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.2 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a70f41
Core
Vermeer
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
622.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
31.57k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
25.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
12.42k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
21.93k (x0.86)
TOTAL
85.64k
91.11k (x1.06)

Multithread

5700X

7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
265.26k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
226.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
114.46k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
16.49k (x1.41)
TOTAL
517.51k
622.34k (x1.2)

Performance/W
5700X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
17781 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4