Ryzen 7 5700X vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
24.09k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
19.54k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
8.48k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
11.68k (x0.46)
TOTAL
85.64k
63.79k (x0.74)
Multithread
5700X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
220.79k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
225.98k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
79.1k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
11.32k (x0.97)
TOTAL
517.51k
537.18k (x1.04)
Performance/W
5700X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4