Ryzen 7 5700U vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700U is 1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700U is 1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
50657
Core
Lucienne
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
16.86k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
12.08k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
3.37k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
6.29k (x0.75)
TOTAL
61.41k
38.61k (x0.63)
Multithread
5700U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
150.99k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
118.54k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
33.44k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
8.6k (x1.7)
TOTAL
324.93k
311.57k (x0.96)
Performance/W
5700U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4