Ryzen 7 5700U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
306f2
Core
Lucienne
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
18.86k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
10.06k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
4.14k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
3.24k (x0.39)
TOTAL
61.41k
36.31k (x0.59)
Multithread
5700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
218.93k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
139.75k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
55.47k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
12.42k (x2.45)
TOTAL
324.93k
426.58k (x1.31)
Performance/W
5700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4