Ryzen 7 5700U vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.2 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.2 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
a0652
Core
Lucienne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
378.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
27.93k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
25.41k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
5.91k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
12.85k (x1.53)
TOTAL
61.41k
72.1k (x1.17)
Multithread
5700U
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
176.41k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
158.8k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
38.53k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
324.93k
378.99k (x1.17)
Performance/W
5700U
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
5831 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700U
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4