| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700U vs Core i3-8100


Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
906eb
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
200.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
24.47k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
21.52k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
4.95k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.24k (x0.98)
TOTAL
61.41k
59.18k (x0.96)

Multithread

5700U

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
92.86k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
83.05k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
18.55k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.93k (x1.17)
TOTAL
324.93k
200.4k (x0.62)

Performance/W
5700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
3083 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4