| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700U vs 3800XT


Description
Both models 5700U and 3800XT are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.6 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
870f10
Core
Lucienne
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
508.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
17.57k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
27.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
9.35k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
23.9k (x2.85)
TOTAL
61.41k
78.2k (x1.27)

Multithread

5700U

3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
176.08k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
219.88k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
100k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
12.93k (x2.55)
TOTAL
324.93k
508.89k (x1.57)

Performance/W
5700U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
4847 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4