| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700U vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700U is 4.2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
810f81
Core
Lucienne
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
9.33k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
17.1k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
3.57k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
3.26k (x0.39)
TOTAL
61.41k
33.26k (x0.54)

Multithread

5700U

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
22.14k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
40.04k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
10.71k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5k (x0.99)
TOTAL
324.93k
77.88k (x0.24)

Performance/W
5700U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4