Ryzen 7 5700U vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906a3
Core
Lucienne
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
225.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
22.61k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
17.73k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
9.63k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.4k (x1)
TOTAL
61.41k
58.37k (x0.95)
Multithread
5700U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
85.49k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
94.93k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
39.15k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
6.08k (x1.2)
TOTAL
324.93k
225.65k (x0.69)
Performance/W
5700U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
5014 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4