Ryzen 7 5700U vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 5700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.8 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700U gets a score of 324.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.8 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
806d1
Core
Lucienne
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.41k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
324.93k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700U
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.9k
33.38k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
26.99k
27.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.14k
11.69k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
17k (x2.03)
TOTAL
61.41k
89.19k (x1.45)
Multithread
5700U
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
115.46k
249.83k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
144.12k
237.26k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.27k
84.18k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
13.2k (x2.6)
TOTAL
324.93k
584.47k (x1.8)
Performance/W
5700U
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
7697 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9608 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4018 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
21662 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700U
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3929 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6278 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2125 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1948 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
14280 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4