Ryzen 7 5700G vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.6 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.6 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
16.86k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
12.08k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
3.37k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
6.29k (x0.25)
TOTAL
84.49k
38.61k (x0.46)
Multithread
5700G
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
150.99k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
118.54k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
33.44k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
8.6k (x0.83)
TOTAL
484.11k
311.57k (x0.64)
Performance/W
5700G
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4