Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
18.64k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
10.55k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
4.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
2.54k (x0.1)
TOTAL
84.49k
35.86k (x0.42)
Multithread
5700G
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
181.66k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
122.09k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
47.02k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
7.22k (x0.69)
TOTAL
484.11k
357.99k (x0.74)
Performance/W
5700G
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4