Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0652
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
30.38k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
27.95k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
6.51k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
14.37k (x0.58)
TOTAL
84.49k
79.2k (x0.94)
Multithread
5700G
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
216.18k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
210.82k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
51.57k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
8.47k (x0.81)
TOTAL
484.11k
487.05k (x1.01)
Performance/W
5700G
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4