Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
28.39k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
24.89k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
5.78k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
13.19k (x0.53)
TOTAL
84.49k
72.25k (x0.86)
Multithread
5700G
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
180.2k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
163.51k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
40.6k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
6.48k (x0.62)
TOTAL
484.11k
390.78k (x0.81)
Performance/W
5700G
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4