| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i3-6100


Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 4.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
506e3
Core
Cezanne
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
22.89k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
21.04k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
4.9k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
4.01k (x0.16)
TOTAL
84.49k
52.84k (x0.63)

Multithread

5700G

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
50.05k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
47.13k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
11.38k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
3.72k (x0.36)
TOTAL
484.11k
112.28k (x0.23)

Performance/W
5700G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4