Ryzen 7 5700G vs 7840HS
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.3 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.3 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a70f41
Core
Cezanne
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
31.57k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
25.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
12.42k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
21.93k (x0.89)
TOTAL
84.49k
91.11k (x1.08)
Multithread
5700G
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
265.26k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
226.13k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
114.46k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
16.49k (x1.59)
TOTAL
484.11k
622.34k (x1.29)
Performance/W
5700G
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4