Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-8365U
Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.8 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.8 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ec
Core
Renoir
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
197.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
24.37k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
22.68k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.98k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
7.7k (x1)
TOTAL
57.92k
59.73k (x1.03)
Multithread
4800U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
89.45k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
85.57k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
19.02k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.41k (x0.9)
TOTAL
356.81k
197.46k (x0.55)
Performance/W
4800U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
13164 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4