Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0652
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
27.14k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
24.75k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.73k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
11.84k (x1.54)
TOTAL
57.92k
69.47k (x1.2)
Multithread
4800U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
105.77k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
107.47k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
24.82k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
8.02k (x2.12)
TOTAL
356.81k
246.07k (x0.69)
Performance/W
4800U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4