Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-13400
Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06f2
Core
Renoir
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
47.01k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
26.73k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
14.28k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
12.1k (x1.58)
TOTAL
57.92k
100.11k (x1.73)
Multithread
4800U
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
228.2k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
160.28k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
71.12k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
38.23k (x10.09)
TOTAL
356.81k
497.83k (x1.4)
Performance/W
4800U
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800U
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4