Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0655
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
35.87k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
31.43k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
7.34k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
15.73k (x1.72)
TOTAL
61.12k
90.37k (x1.48)
Multithread
4800HS
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
377.56k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
347.59k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
88.08k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
12.24k (x1.63)
TOTAL
427.61k
825.47k (x1.93)
Performance/W
4800HS
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4