Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
23.29k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
25.89k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
11.75k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
24.83k (x2.72)
TOTAL
61.12k
85.76k (x1.4)
Multithread
4800HS
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
138.16k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
192.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
80.84k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
9.93k (x1.32)
TOTAL
427.61k
421.05k (x0.98)
Performance/W
4800HS
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4