| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 5800H


Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
20.37k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
22.52k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
10.18k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
21.49k (x2.35)
TOTAL
61.12k
74.56k (x1.22)

Multithread

4800HS

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
144.01k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
191.86k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
84.53k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
6.5k (x0.87)
TOTAL
427.61k
426.9k (x1)

Performance/W
4800HS
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800HS
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4