Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i7-12800H
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a3
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
67.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
467.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
28.42k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
18.93k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
9.92k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
9.86k (x1.08)
TOTAL
61.12k
67.13k (x1.1)
Multithread
4800HS
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
205.57k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
159.7k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
82.78k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
19.36k (x2.58)
TOTAL
427.61k
467.41k (x1.09)
Performance/W
4800HS
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
3549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1840 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
10387 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
5921 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
3944 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2066 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
2055 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
13986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4