Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
90672
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
37.79k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
24.07k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
12.44k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
13.71k (x1.5)
TOTAL
61.12k
88.01k (x1.44)
Multithread
4800HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
212.6k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
197.81k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
84.35k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
17.48k (x2.33)
TOTAL
427.61k
512.23k (x1.2)
Performance/W
4800HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4