Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i3-12100F
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
90675
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
39.54k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
23.79k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
11.96k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
13.52k (x1.48)
TOTAL
61.12k
88.81k (x1.45)
Multithread
4800HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
148k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
123.08k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
52.73k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
16.67k (x2.22)
TOTAL
427.61k
340.49k (x0.8)
Performance/W
4800HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4