Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ed
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
27.81k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
25.88k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.65k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
14.19k (x1.78)
TOTAL
57.47k
73.53k (x1.28)
Multithread
4800H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
175.69k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
166.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
35.04k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
4.23k (x0.79)
TOTAL
436.8k
381.53k (x0.87)
Performance/W
4800H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4