Ryzen 7 4800H vs N100
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 4.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 4.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06e0
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
40.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
92.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
16.04k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
12.17k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
6.25k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
5.74k (x0.72)
TOTAL
57.47k
40.2k (x0.7)
Multithread
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
38k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
34.92k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
15.89k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
3.79k (x0.7)
TOTAL
436.8k
92.6k (x0.21)
Performance/W
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
6333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
5820 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
632 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
15433 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
4718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1838 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1687 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
11824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4