| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs 7800X3D


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 7800X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.6 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a60f12
Core
Renoir
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
98304 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
704.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
36.77k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
23.4k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
14.8k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
29.28k (x3.67)
TOTAL
57.47k
104.26k (x1.81)

Multithread

4800H

7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
249.4k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
167.65k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
104.85k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
182.98k (x34.02)
TOTAL
436.8k
704.89k (x1.61)

Performance/W
4800H
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
5874 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4