Ryzen 7 4700U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
306f2
Core
Renoir
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
18.86k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
10.06k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
4.14k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.24k (x0.41)
TOTAL
49.53k
36.31k (x0.73)
Multithread
4700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
218.93k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
139.75k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
55.47k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
12.42k (x2.3)
TOTAL
269.56k
426.58k (x1.58)
Performance/W
4700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4