Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 5.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 5.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
10.02k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
9.22k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
2.04k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
4.31k (x0.54)
TOTAL
49.53k
25.6k (x0.52)
Multithread
4700U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
21.75k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
20.51k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
4.97k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
5.56k (x1.03)
TOTAL
269.56k
52.78k (x0.2)
Performance/W
4700U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4