Ryzen 7 4700U vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 4700U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4700U gets a score of 269.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/8
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.53k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.56k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4700U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
10.38k
29.53k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.63k
22.59k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.52k
5.99k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
10.22k (x1.28)
TOTAL
49.53k
68.33k (x1.38)
Multithread
4700U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
86.74k
587.06k (x6.77)
Test#2 (FP)
128.69k
496.41k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.71k
134.66k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
22.99k (x4.25)
TOTAL
269.56k
1241.12k (x4.6)
Performance/W
4700U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5783 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8579 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3248 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
17970 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
4700U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5520 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2078 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1949 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
12080 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4